Throat cancer patients exposed to both human papillomavirus (HPV) and tobacco smoke demonstrate a pattern of mutations along several key cancer genes, suggests a research presented at the 2016 Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Cancer Symposium.
These distinct molecular profiles of heavy and light smokers who develop HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) may inform decisions related to treatment intensity by establishing additional prognostic criteria for this subset of patients.
‘DNA mutations predict lower disease free and survival rates among human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive throat cancer patients who smoke.’
Researchers examined the molecular characteristics of OPSCC caused by HPV in an effort to determine which DNA mutations predict lower disease free and survival rates among HPV-positive throat cancer patients who smoke. Whereas most patients with OPSCC caused by HPV have an excellent prognosis for disease free survival, those who also smoke generally face more dire prognoses.
The 66 cases of HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in this study were split into heavy and light smoking behavior groups based on pack years. This metric of smoking frequency over long stretches of time is determined by multiplying the number of years a person has smoked by their average number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day. Forty of the 66 patients reported more than 10 pack years (e.g., more than one pack per day for 10 years or two packs per day for five years), and 26 patients reported fewer than 10 pack years.
“Throat cancer patients who smoked and had a history of fewer than 10 pack years had significantly better disease free and overall survival rates than the heavier smoking group,” said Jose P. Zevallos, MD, MPH, FACS, assistant professor and director of oncologic research in the division of head and neck surgical oncology at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and member of the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. “Our analyses identified several key differences in molecular mutational profiles of the two groups that may shape these outcomes.”
Overall mutation rates were higher for HPV-positive OPSCC patients in the >10 pack year group than those in the
“I think what is most striking is that these genes are mutated almost exclusively in smokers,” said Dr. Zevallos. “This molecular profile suggests that while HPV-positive OPSCC carcinogenesis initiates similarly, tumors in patients who smoke acquire novel mutations not traditionally associated with HPV-associated cancers.” Analyses indicated that the molecular profile of HPV-positive smokers bears similarities to the profile for HPV-negative head and neck cancer, although the profile does maintain several important molecular characteristics of HPV-positive cancer, including frequent PIK3CA and MLL-3 mutations.
Differences in immune-related and tobacco-related gene mutations by smoking status identified in this study may explain why HPV-positive cancer in smokers may be more aggressive. Findings could impact which treatment options are recommended to HPV-positive OPSCC patients by informing clinical trials to establish new molecular parameters to guide determinations of treatment intensity.
“Because HPV-positive throat cancers respond well to treatment, patients often are given the option of choosing less aggressive treatment with fewer side effects,” explained Dr. Zevallos. “Our study begins to set criteria-based changes in tumor DNA that can be used to predict more aggressive cases that should be given more intense treatment. We hope that this information will one day help to guide more personalized treatments for HPV-positive throat cancers.”
Cases were drawn from a North Carolina population-based epidemiologic study conducted from 2001 to 2006 and were examined for mutations across more than 800 genes. Mutations were measured against the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC), an online database of information on mutations in an expert-curated selection of key cancer genes that is maintained by the Sanger Institute as part of its Cancer Genome Project. Somatic mutations, which do not occur in reproductive cells and therefore are not passed on to children, were compared for both frequency and copy number variations, as well as their association with survival outcomes.